New Mexico posted a map that swallows West Texas. I answered with the one from 1836. Ninety thousand views later, there is a serious point sitting underneath the joke.
Texas Nationalist Movement
The Texian Brief
A weekly letter from Daniel Miller  ·  September 7, 2026  ·  8 min read

Somebody running an account called The New Mexico Ranger posted a map on Sunday showing New Mexico grown fat enough to swallow West Texas out past the Pecos. The caption read, behold greater New Mexico.

I answered that night with a map of my own. The Republic of Texas as it drew itself in 1836, up the Rio Grande to its source and then due north, taking in Santa Fe and reaching into what are now five other states. Four words under it. Don't push your luck.

It has been seen more than ninety thousand times since.

New Mexico picked a fight over the map.
It landed because of the difference between the two maps. New Mexico's greater self is a wish. Texas's was law. The Republic declared that boundary, organized it into counties, and sent men to enforce it. One map takes a wedge of West Texas. The other takes Santa Fe.
Why it matters: The joke has a record underneath it, and the record runs one direction. The only counties in this argument that have actually moved to change states are New Mexico's, and the state they were trying to join is Texas. In January two New Mexico representatives, Randall Pettigrew and Jimmy Mason, filed a resolution that would have let three or more contiguous counties vote themselves out of New Mexico. The counties in question, Lea and Eddy and Chaves and Otero, sit on our line and run on the Permian Basin, and two of them send Santa Fe more than half its general fund. Speaker Dustin Burrows answered that Texas would gladly welcome Lea County back where it rightfully belongs. The resolution died in committee, and the idea did not. In March Burrows charged a Texas House committee with studying what it would take to add New Mexico counties to Texas, and with drafting the legislation to begin it. My map is not a fantasy either. Texas carried that claim through annexation and then set about enforcing it, organizing Santa Fe County and sending a commissioner out to stand up county government. In the summer of 1850 Governor Peter Hansborough Bell called a special session and asked the Legislature for authority to send enough force to make Texas authority stick out there. Washington reinforced its garrison at Santa Fe and answered that federal troops would meet any Texans who came. That standoff ended not with Texas backing down but with Congress buying the claim. Ten million dollars, enough to clear the Republic's debts, for about a third of the territory Texas claimed. Underneath the map trading there is a principle, and it cuts one way only. The case for Texas independence rests on a single sentence. The people who live in a place should decide how that place is governed. That sentence does not let a man vote on ground he does not live on, which is why I am not actually campaigning for Santa Fe. It also does not stop politely at a state line. If four counties in southeastern New Mexico have the right to decide whether Santa Fe governs them, then Texans have the right to decide whether Washington governs Texas. You cannot hold the first and refuse the second without admitting the rule was never a principle to begin with. New Mexico can draw whatever map it likes. Texas does not need to draw one. The line moves when the people standing on it ask, and so far the only people asking are New Mexicans.

The same argument, twice more, in the same seven days.

Iceland went to the polls a week ago Saturday and told its own government no, on eighty two percent turnout, when asked whether to restart the European Union membership talks it shelved in 2013. Scotland published a finished Independence Referendum Bill that it is not permitted to introduce, because the Supreme Court in London ruled in 2022 that Scotland may not hold that vote without Westminster's consent, and no British government has given it since 2014. And Alberta set October nineteenth for ten questions about its place in Canada, one of them asking whether the province should begin the legal process toward a binding vote on separating. That one reached the ballot by citizen petition. Premier Danielle Smith will not campaign for it, has been asked to cancel it, and has refused, on the ground that the question belongs to Albertans rather than to her. We said where we stand on Alberta when they started, and nothing about that has changed.

Three peoples, one question, and the only one that cannot get a ballot printed is the one that accepted early, in good faith, that its right to ask belonged to somebody else.

Set that beside four counties on our own western line petitioning to leave Santa Fe and the pattern is hard to miss. Peoples deciding who governs them is ordinary business now, running on two continents at once, and the argument against it is never that the question itself is illegitimate. It is only ever that somebody else would prefer you not ask.

What Scotland published

A law about money took effect here on the first.

While Edinburgh was publishing a bill it is not allowed to introduce, a provision of House Bill 1056 quietly came into force in Texas. Gold and silver are legal tender here now.

The headline is a good deal bigger than the statute. The metals qualify when they carry their weight and purity and are not passed off as government currency. Nobody can be made to accept them. No Texan can be required to offer them. What the law creates is an option between two people who both agree to it, and the machinery that would make it practical at a register does not exist yet. The comptroller is directed to stand up an electronic system, backed by bullion held in the Texas Bullion Depository, that would let Texans move metal the way they move dollars. That piece is authorized for the spring of 2027.

So it is plumbing rather than a revolution, and I am not going to oversell it. But I have spent a long time arguing that a people who mean to govern themselves have to be able to run their own economy, and money sits at the top of that list. Every function Texas can already perform for itself is a function it never has to ask permission to perform.

Nobody marched for this one. The statute simply came on, on a Tuesday, and now it is true.

What the law actually says

We fixed two front doors. One of them was ours.

For years the case for Texas independence lived in about six places, none of which knew the others were there. The polling on one site, the legal argument on another, county organizing somewhere else again. If you wanted to hand a skeptical brother in law one link, there wasn't one to hand him. There is now. thetnm.org has been rebuilt from the studs, and the whole case sits under one roof. The plan, the polling, an FAQ built for the exact moment somebody says fine, but what about the currency, or the border, or the military. A live count of registered supporters, which crossed 668,000 this week. A map of all 254 counties, so you can look up your own and see where it stands. Will Kacy walked the whole thing on this month's This Month @ the TNM, about eleven minutes, and it is the fastest tour there is.

The second door is the one I am less proud of. A great many of you have a TEXIAN account you have never once used, created for you back when you signed something. When you went to sign up, the app told you an account already existed and to go sign in, and then would not let you sign in, because there had never been a password on it. So you did the reasonable thing and gave up. I would have given up too. That was ours to catch, it sat there far longer than it should have, and the people it was quietly turning away were the ones who had already said yes.

It got fixed on Friday. If that was you, the door opens now.

Take the tour

If you do one thing off this letter, go try your account. Not because I need a number to move, but because there is a real chance you are one of the people who was locked out of something you had already joined, and the lock is off now. Once you are in, look up your county and see where it stands, then look up your representative and see whether he has signed the Pledge. That is four minutes. At the end of it you will know more about your own ground than most of the people who talk about Texas for a living.
Get into your account
A joke map on a Sunday night. A finished bill in Edinburgh that nobody is allowed to introduce. Four counties on our western line petitioning to come home to Texas. A statute about gold that switched on without a parade. None of that looks like one story until you notice that every piece of it is an argument about who decides. That is the only question this movement has ever really been about. What is encouraging, this week, is how many peoples are asking it out loud at the same time, and how ordinary it has started to sound.
Somebody is going to hand you a map this week, or an argument, or a but what about. Write back and tell me the one you get hit with most often at your own kitchen table. I am collecting them, and the good ones end up in the FAQ where everybody can use them.
Daniel Miller
Daniel Miller
President
Texas Nationalist Movement
P.S. Eight down, thirty six to go in the vault. If you are only now picking it up, start with mine from the thirty first and let the rest come a morning at a time.

Supported by
Universal Coin & Bullion
Universal Coin & Bullion is a gold and silver dealer in Beaumont, Texas, and the first Founding Partner of the Texas Nationalist Movement.
This is a paid partnership. The Texas Nationalist Movement does not endorse UCB's products or services, and UCB had no role in TNM editorial. Not investment advice.

Texas Nationalist Movement
3318 Hwy 365 Suite 243, Nederland, TX 77627
You received this because you're subscribed to TNM updates.
Unsubscribe  ·  Update preferences  ·  Privacy